JOHN
CHAPTER 18
INTRODUCTION
In the previous chapter we saw the concern Jesus had for
His disciples. He knew what was to
happen and how His disciples would react.
He sought to comfort them with words of reassurance and a promise that
He would not leave them alone.
JESUS BETRAYED
1 When Jesus had SPOKEN THESE
WORDS, He went forth with His disciples over the ravine of the Kidron, where there was a garden, in which He entered with
His disciples.
- This valley is also know as "Valley of Jehoshaphat meaning the valley where God will Judge
2 Now Judas also, who was
betraying Him, knew the place, for Jesus had often met there with His disciples
- How did Judas know where Jesus would be?
3 Judas then, having received
the Roman cohort and officers from the chief priests and the Pharisees, came
there with lanterns and torches and weapons.
- The Roman cohort consisted of approximately 960 men
- Why were so many men needed to capture Jesus?
- They probably feared large crowds of Jews would gather
4 So Jesus, knowing all the
things that were coming upon Him, went forth *and
said to them, “Whom do
you seek?” (X Jn 13:1)
- Why did Jesus ask this question when He knew what the answer would be?
- I believe for the benefit of His disciples so they would remember what He had told them
- Also to focus their attention on Him and not His disciples
5 They answered Him, “Jesus the Nazarene.” *He
said to them, “I
am He.” And
Judas also, who was betraying Him, was standing with them.
6 So when He said to them, “I am He,” they drew back and fell to the ground.
- What or who caused them to fall to the ground?
- The Power of God was demonstrated to them so there would be know doubt He could have defeated them and prevented them from taking Him
7 Therefore He again asked them, “Whom do you seek?” And they said, “Jesus the Nazarene.”
- Was Jesus giving them the chance to back away from His power?
- When Jesus first replied they fell back or stepped back perhaps surprised then fell to the ground
8 Jesus answered, “I told you that I
am He; so if you seek Me,
let these go their way,”
9 to fulfill the word which He
spoke, “Of those whom You have given Me I lost not one.”
- Jesus sought to protect His disciples in this dark hour
10
Simon Peter then, having a sword, drew it and struck the
high priest’s slave, and cut off his right ear: and the slaves name was Malchus.
- Where did Peter get the sword?
- I don’t believe Jesus would have allowed any of His disciples to carry weapons except perhaps a staff.
- We can surmise peter got the sword from one of the soldiers in the cohort
11 So Jesus said to
Peter, “Put the sword into the sheath; the
cup which the Father has given Me, shall I not
drink it?”
- Jesus telling Peter would you have me not do the will of the Father?
JESUS BROUGHT BEFORE PILOT
12
So the Roman cohort and the commander and the officers of
the Jews, arrested Jesus and bound Him,
13 and led Him
to Annas first; for
he was father-in-law of Caiaphas, who was high priest that year.
- Annas was the son of Seth and was appointed by the Roman legate Quirinius as the first High priest of Iudeaea in 6AD
- Caiaphas was appointed by Rome to be high priest for that year.
14 Now Caiaphas was the one
who had advised the Jews that it was expedient for
one man to die on behalf of the people. (X Jn 11:50 )
- As the Roman appointed high priest Caiaphas would guard his position zealously.
- As high priest (ruler of Jewish religion) Caiaphas enjoyed the luxury and power of the office.
- Much in the same way as our elected officials enjoy their luxury and power today
- Caiaphas convinced the Pharisees of the need to permanently prevent Jesus from causing problems with the Roman rule
15 Simon Peter was
following Jesus,
and so was another disciple. Now that
disciple was known to the high priest, and
entered with Jesus into the court of the high priest,
- It would seem that not all the disciples scattered when Jesus was taken
- Simon Peter followed the cohort at a discrete distance
- Peter did not immediately enter the court yard of the high priest
16 but Peter was standing at
the door outside. So the other disciple, who was
known to the high priest, went out and spoke to the
doorkeeper, and brought Peter in
- Who was this other disciple who had garnished much favor of the high priest?
- Although not named here I believe this person to be no other than Judas Iscariot
- I don’t believe any other disciple would have been allowed into the court yard
- Even the Roman cohort out of respect did not enter the court yard
17 Then the slave-girl who
kept the door *said to Peter, “You are not also one of
this man’s disciples, are you?” *He said, “I am not.”
- Now the other disciple (Judas) had talked to the keeper of the door and convinced her to let Peter in
- The slave girl must have know Judas to be a disciple and drew a natural conclusion
18 Now the slaves and
the officers were standing there, having made a
charcoal fire, for it was cold and they were warming themselves; and Peter was
also with them, standing and warming himself. 19 The he high priest then questioned
Jesus about His disciples, and about His teaching.
- Was this to be a fair trial?
- The verdict was never in doubt
- Were the questioning asked to find the truth?
- I believe these questions were designed to gather intelligence on Jesus and His disciples
- That this information could be used against Jesus
20 Jesus answered him, “I have spoken openly
to the world; I always taught in synagogues and in the temple, where all the
Jews come together; and I spoke nothing in secret. (X Mat
4:23 Jn 6:59 )
- Jesus taught the Jews people in the open using for the most part parables.
- Jesus used these parable to illustrate to all who would have ears to hear truth
- Jesus did however give guidance and instruction to His disciples in private.
- Mark records Jesus did not answer the charges made before Caiaphas (x Mk 14:60
- Possibly He was waiting for a question worthy of responce
21 “Why do you question Me?
Question those who have heard what I spoke to them;
they know what I said.”
22 When He had
said this, one of the officers standing nearby struck Jesus,
saying, “Is that the way You answer the high priest?”
- The officer struck Jesus because he thought Jesus was show disrespect by His answer
- This officer was one of the priestly guards not a Roman officer
- The Romans were outside the court yard.
23 Jesus answered him, “If I
have spoken wrongly, testify of the wrong; but if rightly, why do you strike
Me?
- Why did the priests guard strike Jesus?
- It was part of his job to discipline those he perceived to show disrespect to the high priest
- The guard had no idea of who he was striking
24 So Annas sent Him bound to Caiaphas the high priest.
PETERS DENILE
25 Now Simon Peter was
standing and warming himself. So they said to him, “You are
not also one of His disciples, are you?” He
denied it, and said, “I am not.”
- This question way asked by a female slave who was the door keeper.
- Did Peter fear he too would be turned over to the priest as a conspirator?
- Peter told Jesus he would die for Him
- But when put to the test he failed to even acknowledge Jesus, just as Jesus had told him he would.
26 One of the slaves of the high priest, being a
relative of the one whose ear Peter cut off, said, did I not see you in the
garden with Him?”
- This slave was surely one of those who was in the garden when Jesus was arrested and yet the slave asked the question in an accusative manner
27
Peter then denied it again, and immediately a
rooster crowed.
- Peter denied Jesus three times just as Jesus had told him
- Jesus forgave Peter his denial.
- This demonstrates the magnitude of Jesus’
JESUS BROUGHT TO PILOT
28 Then *they LED Jesus from
Caiaphas into the Praetorium, and it was early; and they
themselves did not enter into the Praetorium so the would not be defiled, but might eat the Passover.
- The term referred originally to the "tent of the commander, or praetor", and thus denoted military headquarters.
- Two possible praetorium sites in Jerusalem have been proposed: the Antonia Fortress and Herod's Palace.
29
Therefore Pilate went *out to them and said,
“What accusation do you bring against this Man?
30 They answered and said to
him, “If this Man were not an evildoer, we would not have
delivered Him to you.”
- They did not accuse Jesus of violating Roman law at this time.
- Instead they said He was accused of being an evildoer.
- This led Pilot to believe that Jesus had violated some Jewish law and should be judged by the religious leaders
31 So Pilate said to
them, “Take Him yourselves, and judge Him according to your
law.” The Jews said to him, “We are not permitted to
put anyone to death,”
According to the Mishnah (Sanhedrin 1:4) the death penalty could only be inflicted, after trial, by a Sanhedrin composed of twenty-three judges and there were four types of death penalty (Sanhedrin 7:1): stoning, burning, slaying (by the sword), and strangling. A bare reading of these and the other accounts in the tractate would seem to suggest a vast proliferation of the death penalty. [Rabbi Louis Jacobs]
In
theory, Judaism had a death penalty for several different crimes, including
murder. But acceptance of the death penalty was theoretical and never
implemented according to tradition. According to Jewish Law, one was only
deserving of a death penalty if two witnesses saw the crime, warned the
aggressor of the consequences, the aggressor acknowledged the situation and
consequences, and committed the crime anyway. Thus, Judaism established
conditions that made death penalty sentencing nearly impossible, even in a
theoretical situation. [Rabbi Barry Dov Lerner]
- Now the high priest could not take a chance on a full trial because there were those in the Sanhedrin who not vote for the death penalty.
- The only witnesses who could testify of Jesus and His teachings would testify to His innocence.
- The high priest believed that Jesus must be put to death to ensure his position as high priest
- And to ensure the people would not rise up and place Jesus on the throne as messiah and king
- If Caiaphas could get the Romans to execute Jesus then his hands would be clean … after all he didn’t pass judgment in violation of Jewish law
- The high priest was instrumental in fulfilling the prophesy, concerning the manner of death of Jesus. (V32)
32 to fulfill the word of
Jesus which He spoke, signifying by what kind of
death He was about to die.
- Luke 18:32 “For He will be handed over to the Gentiles, and will be mocked and mistreated and spit upon,”… (X Mat 26:2 )
33 Therefore Pilate entered again into
the Praetorium, and summoned Jesus and said to
Him, “Are You the King of the Jews?”
- Had Jesus just said yes I am then Pilot would be justified in believing the charge of sedition.
34 Jesus answered, “Are you saying this on your
own initiative, or did others tell you about Me?”
- “Jesus asked whether Pilate’s question arose from his own Roman viewpoint or from a Jewish viewpoint” [Ryrie Bible]
35 Pilate answered, “I am not a Jew, am I? Your own nation and the
chief priests delivered You to me; what have You done?
- Pilot did not answer Jesus’ question
- Pilots response was one of indignity saying how am I supposed to know of you except for what I have been told by the Chief Priest
36 Jesus answered, “My
kingdom [or kingship]is not of
this world. If My kingdom were of this world, then My
servants would be fighting so that I would not be handed over to the Jews” but
as it is, My kingdom is not of this realm.”
- Because Pilate’s answer indicated that he was concerned only about a rival political kingdom to Rome (v35), our Lord replied as He did in this verse, indicating that His was not such a kingdom. Pilate was then satisfied Jesus was not a political threat and therefore wished to release Him.
- Jesus was tell Pilate that His kingship and authority was not of this world
37 Therefore Pilate said to Him,
“So You are a king?” Jesus answered, “You say correctly that I am a king. For this I have been born, and for this I
have come into the world, to testify to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth hears My voice.”
- Matthew, Mark, and Luke reported Jesus’ as: “it is as you say” Mat 27:11; Mark 15:2 ; Luke 23:3
- “For this I have been born
38 Pilate *said to Him, “What is
truth?”
- Pilate was not being philosophical but was simply expressing frustration and irritation at Jesus’ avoidance of a direct answer to what seemed to him to be a simple question [Ryrie Bible commentary]
39 And when he had said this,
he went out again to the Jews *and said to them, “I
find no guilt in Him.
40 So they cried out
again, saying, “Not this Man, but
Barabbas.” Now Barabbas was a robber.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Post your comments here: