Wednesday, July 29, 2015


CHAPTER 26
 
Begin at 2:49:44

PAULS DEFENSE BEFORE THE KING


 

 Paul once again defends himself.  However this time before Agrippa II the King.

Summary by Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset and David Brown and published in 1871.
“This speech, though in substance the same as that from the fortress stairs of Jerusalem (Acts 22:1-29 ), differs from it in being less directed to meet the charge of apostasy from the Jewish faith, and giving more enlarged views of his remarkable change and apostolic commission, and the divine support under which he was enabled to brave the hostility of his countrymen.” [4]

Paul’s Defense before Agrippa II


1 Agrippa said to Paul, “You are permitted to speak for yourself.”  Then Paul stretched out his hand and proceeded to make his defense:  2 “In regard to all the things of which I am accused by the Jews, I consider myself fortunate, King Agrippa, that I am about to make my defense before you today; 3 especially because you are an expert in all customs and questions among the Jews; therefore I beg you to listen to me patiently. 

We can safely assume Paul was in chains as he states in ACTS 26:20

Paul waved his hands to show the King honor as was the custom during that time, (see also Acts 24:2-4).

It was also the custom to praise rulers as Paul did in verses two and three.

Paul knew the kings father was a zealous student of the law and so also was his son king Agrippa II.

  

4  “So then, all Jews know my manner of life from my youth up, which from the beginning was spent among my own nation and at Jerusalem; 5 since they have known about me for a long time, if they are willing to testify, that I lived as a Pharisee according to the strictest sect of our religion.

Paul is careful to point out he was educated as a Pharisee and adhered to this strict compliance of all Jewish law and customs all his life.

The sect spoken of here was in fact the section of the Jewish people known as the Pharisee.

6 “And now I am standing trial for the hope of the promise made by God to our fathers; 7 the promise to which our twelve tribes hope to attain, as they earnestly serve God night and day. And for this hope O King, I am being accused by Jews.

The hope referred to by Paul was the promises of a messiah and the resurrection of the dead on the day of judgment.

Paul’s belief that Jesus was the promised Messiah (Acts 32,33), was the real cause of this legal action brought against him.

This belief was not necessarily shared by other Pharisee's.

The pretext of the sedition charge was not mentioned here by Paul.

8 “Why is it considered incredible among you people if God does raise the dead?

God raised Jesus from the dead and he walked the earth again.

Not only the chosen 11 but also 500 people witnessed Jesus after his resurrection.

This event, known by Jews and Romans alike, should have added credence to Paul’s statement.

However the Romans probably dismissed these stories as superstitious nonsense.

While his listeners pondered Paul’s rhetorical question.  Paul proceeds with his argument in verse 9.

9 “So then, I thought to myself that I had to do many things hostile to the name of Jesus of Nazareth.

Paul was well known as a hater and persecutor of those who believed in the resurrection of Jesus.

He, like those who were accusing him, was a Jew who did not understand who Jesus was, or the faith of those who belonged to this new religion called the Way.

Because of this lack of understanding Paul, and others like him, branded Jesus and His followers as enemies of the Jewish faith.

10 “And this is just what I did in Jerusalem; not only did I lock up many of the saints in prisons, having received authority from the chief priests, but also when they were being put to death I cast my vote against them.

Paul recounts the hatred he held for Jesus and His followers.

I believe Paul had more than one purpose for telling the king of the extent of his own actions towards those who followed Jesus.

At the end of this verse we see Paul  obviously thinking of the stoning of Steven; where Paul enthusiastically  approved of the stoning.

11 “And as I punished them often in all the synagogues, I tried to force them to blaspheme; and being furiously enraged at them, I kept pursuing them even to foreign cities.

Here we see Paul setting the stage for his defense.

The phrase “I tried to force them to blaspheme”,  was the very charge which the Jews now accused Paul.

Telling the king of these things he had done; Paul was making himself like those who were accusing him. 

By doing this he would show the irony of the charges brought against him.

12 And they stirred up the people, the elders and the scribes, and they came up to him and dragged him away and brought him before the Council.

Luke records this story in two other chapters, Acts 9:1-18 and again in Acts 22:4-16.

Notice Paul did not recount his encounter with Jesus as he did with his Jewish audience.

Because He was addressing Gentiles I believe Paul wanted to emphasize what Jesus said, and how is was changed.

Keeping this in mind we can see why he tells of his encounter with Jesus in verse 13 and following.

 

13 at midday, O King, I saw on the way a light from heaven, brighter than the sun, shining all around me and those who were journeying with me.  14 “And when we had all fallen to the ground, I heard a voice saying to me in the Hebrew dialect, ‘Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me? It is hard for you to kick against the goads.’

The word goads was translated from the Greek word: kentron ken'-tron from kenteo (to prick); a point ("centre"), prick, sting.

Up to verse 14 the account was the same as in Acts 9:1-18.

However In Verse 14 Paul tells of other things Jesus told him.

Why did Paul wait till now to tell the rest of the story.

Up to this point Paul’s audience was the Jews now he is addressing the Gentiles.

The latter part of verse 14 Paul told the king; how Paul’s own stubbornness was actually hurting himself.

Jesus told Paul a popular proverb about a farmer using a pointed stick to trained a stubborn cow to pull a plow without kicking.

As the cow kicked, the stick would prick the cows leg causing pain. because the cow fought against pulling the plow, it suffered pain.  After a few pricks in the leg the cow learned to obey, and so did Paul.

Often we need to be pricked to learn to obey.

15 “And I said, ‘Who are You, Lord? And the Lord said, ‘I am Jesus whom you are persecuting.

As we have learned in Acts 9:1-18 Paul heard and understood the voice but no one else with him understood.

15a indicates to us Paul did not recognize Jesus, he did, however acknowledged him as a heavenly spirit and showed respect by calling him Lord.

“The word Lord was translated from the Greek word: kurios koo'-ree-os from kuros (supremacy); supreme in authority, i.e. (as noun) controller; by implication, Master (as a respectful title):-- God, Lord, master, Sir.” [

This would explain why Jesus introduced himself to Paul.

16 ‘But get up and stand on your feet; for this purpose I have appeared to you, to appoint you a minister and a witness not  only to the things which you have seen, but also to the things in which I will appear to you;

Jesus was telling Paul to get ready to serve him as a witness as to what was revealed thus far to him, and to minister to those things of which would be revealed to him in the future.

Luke 1:2 speaks of the eye witness accounts of Jesus as revealed to Paul.

Paul would see visions after his encounter with Jesus. 

The following are five such times:

1.     Acts 18:9-10 – Jesus says ‘do not be afraid.’

2.     Acts 22:17-21 – They won’t accept your testimony.

3.     Acts 23:11 – Take courage.

4.     2 Cor 12:1-10 – Paul sees Jesus caught up.

5.     Gal 1:12  - Received a revelation from Jesus.

In verses 7-18 Paul quotes what Jesus had told him on the road to Damascus.

 

17 rescuing you from the Jewish people and from the Gentiles, to whom I am sending you, 18 to open their eyes so that they may turn from darkness to light and from the dominion of Satan to God, that they may  receive forgiveness of sins and  an inheritance among those who have been sanctified by faith in Me.’ 

Paul could not have given a better testimony to these Gentile’s.

Paul reveals the assurance given to him by Jesus.

These promises mirrors Isaiah 61:1 and Luke 4:18.

Let’s take a closer look at these verses.

The phrase Jesus used was open their eyes so that they may turn from darkness to light.

We know from Acts 9:1-18 Paul was made blind so he might see.

To open the eyes of those who Paul was and would be witnessing to is similar in effect as to what happened to Paul.

Those he ministered to were blinded to the truth.

Isaiah used the metaphor of blindness and opening the eyes in Isaiah 35:5; Isaiah 42:7; and Isaiah 42:16.  

The Phrase darkness to light refers to sin and Satan’s domain as darkness and Gods domain as light.

When a person is blind they see only darkness.

Satan desires to keep men in spiritual darkness where he rules.

The phrase sanctified by faith in Me.’ tells us those who choose to believe with faith in Jesus are set apart from those who do not, and they no longer live in the darkness of ignorance and despair but rather bask in the radiance of Jesus’ eternal light.

 

  

19 “So, King Agrippa, I did not prove disobedient to the heavenly vision, 20 but kept declaring both to those of Damascus first, and also at Jerusalem and then throughout all the region of Judea, and even to the Gentiles, that they should repent and turn to God, performing deeds appropriate to repentance.

Paul preached the message containing four crucial components

1.     Stop sinning.

2.      Repent those sins.

3.     Turn away from sin and turn to God.

4.     Show the sincerity of their  repentance by a change in their lives.

(Matthew 3:8 and Luke 3:8 tell us those who repent and accept Jesus will bear fruit as a sign of their faith.

21 “For this reason some Jews seized me in the temple and tried to put me to death.

Paul begins his closing argument before the king in verse 22.


22 “So, having obtained help from God, I stand to this day testifying both to small and  great, stating nothing but what the Prophets and Moses said was going to take place; God had spared Paul’s life on several occasions, enabling him to witness to the Jews and Gentiles of salvation through Christ Jesus.

Most biblical scholars see Deuteronomy 18:15-22 as the prophesy of the coming Messiah.

Paul spoke of the prophets who spoke of the coming Messiah.

God spared Paul’s life to carry out his plan for redemption of the Gentiles

  

23 that the Christ was to suffer, and that by reason of His resurrection from the dead He would be the first to proclaim light both to the Jewish people and then to the Gentiles.”

Isaiah 53: 4-5 and following: tells us of the prophesy of the suffering Messiah.

Paul states he was teaching only those things of which Moses and the prophets prophesied.

He spoke of the prophesies being had occurred in the birth, death and resurrection of Jesus.

24 While Paul was saying this in his defense, Festus *said in a loud voice, “Paul, you are out of your mind! Your  great learning is driving you mad.”

Romans believed in many Gods and when a person was dead that was the end.

The concept of a resurrection of the dead was not possible in Roman culture.

Therefore when Paul said Jesus was risen from the dead; Festus thought him to be crazy, driven to insanity by his studies.

Paul had well over a great many eye witness to Jesus resurrection to life.  He himself had seen a vision of Jesus on the road to Damascus.

25 But Paul *said, “I am not out of my  mind, most excellent Festus, but I utter words of sober truth.

Even though Paul was a Jew he also was a Roman citizen who knew of  Roman culture and beliefs.

Paul knew Festus would find it difficult to believe Jesus died and lived again.

Paul emphatically told Festus, he was of sound mind and all that he had told him was the truth.

The word sober was translated from the Greek word:  sophrosune  (so-fros-oo'-) literally sanity or (figuratively) self-control.

26 “For the king knows about these matters, and I speak to him also with confidence, since I am persuaded that none of these things escape his notice; for this has not been done in a corner. 27 “King Agrippa, do you believe the Prophets? I know that you do.”

The king was there to serve as counsel to Agrippa II.

In verse 27 Paul spoke very boldly to the King painting him into a corner to so the king would validate what he was saying.

A shrewd move by Paul.

28 Agrippa replied to Paul, “In a short time you will persuade me to become a Christian.”

This statement could be seen as a sarcastic remark.

Or is it possible, Agrippa was telling Paul that he was not easily convinced; it would take much more to persuade him to believe as Paul did.

29 And Paul said, “I would wish to God, that whether in a short or long time, not only you, but also all who hear me this day, might become such as I am, except for these chains.” 

Picture Paul standing before the king and important people in what must have looked like rags compared to the splendor of dignitaries attire; he may have been holding up his hands shaking his chains.

Whether Agrippa’s remark was sarcastic or a mild rebuke Paul’s reply was brilliant

Paul didn’t miss a beat and kept the focus on his mission.

30 The king stood up and the governor and Bernice, and those who were sitting with them, 31 and when they had gone aside, they began talking to one another, saying, “This man is not doing anything worthy of death or imprisonment.” 32 And  Agrippa said to Festus, “This man might have been set free if he had  not appealed to Caesar.”

At this point the King realizing there was no grounds for imprisonment or death; rose and with the governor privately conferred.

Once the appeal was made to Caesar, they had no choice but to grant Paul’s request.


 

CREDITS, LINKS, AND CITATION

[1] –scripture verses from Cross wire Study Bible


[3] – Commentaries By Marion Adams

[4] – Wikipedia.org


 

Monday, July 20, 2015

ACTS CHAPTER 25 - PAUL BEFORE FESTUS


PAUL ACCUSED BEFORE FESTUS

Chapter 25 begins at 2:44:35


Summary Verses 1-5

In verses 1-12 we will see Festus arriving in Jerusalem and refusing to have Paul brought to Jerusalem for a hearing.  However Festus held a hearing for Paul’s accusers and heard their complaints.  We will also see Paul assert his rights, as a Roman citizen, and appeals to Caesar. 
We will see in the first 5 versus the mistrust the Jews held for the Roman rulers, and actions taken by Festus to pacify the Jews.  Later in verses 14 & 15 we will see, yet another plot brewing to kill Paul.
Paul before Festus.

1  Festus then, having arrived in the province, three days later went up to Jerusalem from Casesarea. 2  And the chief priests and the leading men of the Jews brought charges against Paul, and they were urging him,

Procius Festus was  procurator of Judea from about AD 59 to 62, succeeding Antonius Felix. His exact time in office is not known. The earliest proposed date for the start of his term is c. A.D. 55-6, while the latest is A.D. 61.[1] [4].  
The King James translation tells us “Festus ascended to Jerusalem after three days.”  The accusing Jews wasted no time in going to the new governor with their complaints about Paul.  Felix reportedly restored peace to the area by using much force and was said to be a very cruel man.  Considering his reputation, it should not be a surprise to anyone that the Jews did not trust Roman rulers.
Festus (the new governor) knowing Felix’s reputation, thought it necessary to gain favor with the Jews in order to keep the peach, and secure their cooperation.
We will see Festus knew very little of the details of the accusations brought against Paul.

3  requesting a concession against Paul, that he might have him brought to Jerusalem (at the same time, setting an ambush to kill him on the way).

The word concession; was translated from the Greek word charis khar'-ece; meaning favor.  Two years had passed and these same Jews continued with plans to Kill Paul (Acts 23:14-15.)  Their plans were simply to ambush Paul on the way to Jerusalem.  It is doubtful Festus knew about the earlier plan to kill Paul while in Jerusalem.  I believe Festus was equally unaware of the motive behind the Jewish leader asking for Paul to be returned to Jerusalem.  This time however they wanted the new governor to execute Paul without even a trial.  As we will see in verse 16   

4  Festus then answered that Paul was being kept in custody at Caesarea and that he himself was about to leave shortly. 5  “Therefore,” [he said], “let the influential men among you go there with me, and if there is anything wrong about the man, let them prosecute him.”

It would appear Festus did not want any part of trying Paul.  The new governor told the accusing Jews to have their leaders try Paul in Caeserea if he broke Jewish law.

6  After he had spent not more than eight or ten days among them, he went down to Caesarea, and on the next day he took his seat on the tribunal and ordered Paul to be brought.

I don’t believe Felix gave Festus much information about Paul.  Felix may have only said Paul was a Roman citizen accused by his own people, of crimes.  Felix offered no proof of guilt because there was none.  Festus had to summon for Paul in order to hear from his lips his accounting of the charges brought against him, in accordance to Roman law.

 7  After Paul arrived, the Jews who had come down from Jerusalem stood around him, bringing many and serious charges against him which they could not prove, 8  while Paul said in his own defense, “I have committed no offense either against the Law of the Jews or against the temple or against Caesar.”

The unproven charges levied against Paul were a jumbled up mix of politics and religion.  Festus needed to here Paul’s side to determine the validity of the charges.

9  But Festus, wishing to do the Jews a favor, answered Paul and said, “Are you willing to go up to Jerusalem and stand trial before me on these charges?”

Festus was at a loss on how to investigate these accusations (see also Acts 25:20 ).  Festus wanted to ingratiate himself with the Jews ensuring a peaceful governorship.  Festus was offering Paul his protection when he said “before Me”, not that he would try Paul in Jerusalem himself.  The governor knew Paul had broken no Roman laws.  Although Festus was not going back to Jerusalem with Paul.  He would render a favorable decision after hearing the Sanhedrin’s verdict.   We must remember Paul was born a Roman citizen and had rights!

10  But Paul said, “I am standing before Caesar’s tribunal, where I ought to be tried.  I have done no wrong to the Jews, as you also very well know.

  The word tribunal was translated from the Greek word: bema bay'-ma; by implication, a rostrum, i.e. a tribunal:--judgment-seat, set (foot) on, throne.  Paul was saying as a Roman, I am standing before the proper judgment seat.  The governor was Caesar's representative in Judea.  During this time another assignation plot was planed, which neither Festus nor Paul were not aware of.

11  “If, then, I am a wrongdoer and have committed anything worthy of death, I do not refuse to die; but if none of those things is true of which these men accuse me, no one can hand me over to them. I appeal to Caesar.”

Paul saw Festus giving into the Jewish authorities.  Paul knew he would not receive a fair trial in Jerusalem and seeing Festus’s reluctance to try him himself called on Caesar.  Paul’s Roman citizenship gave him the right to appeal to Caesar for judgment.  Caesar was the final authority in all matters. In much the same way, our supreme court has final judiciary authority.

12  Then when Festus had conferred with his council, he answered, “You have appealed to Caesar, and to Caesar you shall go.  13  Now when several days had elapsed, King Agrippa and Bernice arrived at Caesarea and paid their respects to Festus.

Herod Agrippa II (AD 27/28[1] – ca. 92 or 100[1][2]) officially named Marcus Julius Agrippa and sometimes just called Agrippa, was the seventh and last king of the family of Herod the Great, the Herodians. He was the son of the first and better-known Herod Agrippa, the brother of Berenice, Mariamne, and Drusilla (second wife of the Roman procurator Antonius Felix).[3]  [4]   
Agrippa was the great grandson of Herod the Great who ruled during Jesus’ ministry (See also Acts 12:1).  This young king only 17 years old at the time, and thought to be to young to rule, caused the annexation of Judea to Syria.  Agrippa II was made king in 56 AD.  His authority extended as far as naming the high priest of the Jews.  Agrippa II was favored by Caesar.  Festus solicited the young kings counsel because of this and his knowledge of the Jews.

14  While they were spending many days there, Festus laid Paul’s case before the King, saying, “There is a man who was left as a prisoner by Felix; and when I was at Jerusalem, the chief priests and the elders of the Jews brought charges against him asking for a sentence of condemnation against him. 15 and when I was at Jerusalem, the chief priests and the elders of the Jews brought charges against him, asking for a sentence of condemnation against him.

Festus relates the circumstances behind the actions taken thus far regarding Paul.  Even though Agrippa was young, only 20, Festus knew of his favorite status. 

16  “I answered them that it is not the custom of the Romans to hand over any man before the accused meets his accusers face to face and has an opportunity to make his defense against the charges. 17 “So after they had assembled here, I did not delay, but on the next day took my seat on the tribunal and ordered the man to be brought before me.

Festus continues his case before the king.  Once again we see how Laws of the U.S.A. are patterned after Roman law.  In our legal system every accused has the undeniable right to be faced by his/her accusers.

18 “When the accusers stood up, they began bringing charges against him not of such crimes as I was expecting, 19 but they simply had some points of disagreement with him about their own religion and about a dead man, Jesus, whom Paul asserted to be a live.

Festus continues by stating the case brought to him by Paul’s accusers.  Festus was prepared to hear civil, not Jewish religious charges, against Paul.  The word religion was translated from the Greek word deisidaimonia dice-ee-dahee-mon-ee'-ah from the same as 1174; religion:--superstition. see GREEK for 117[4].  Fetus referred to the accusers beliefs derogatorily as superstition.
 
20  “Being at a loss how to investigate such matters, I asked whether he was willing to go to Jerusalem and there stand trial on these matters.

In this verse Fetus was telling Agrippa he did not know how to get to the truth.  This is in contrast as to what was said in verse 9.  Because Paul appealed to Caesar, Festus was forced to account the details of the charges in writing.  Fetus was appealing to Agrippa because he needed his help.  The record of the charges would accompany Paul by escort to Rome.

21  “But when Paul appealed to be held in custody for the Emperor’s decision, I ordered him to be kept in custody until I send him to Caesar.” 22 Then Agrippa said to Festus, “I also would like to hear the man myself.”  “Tomorrow,” he said, “you shall hear him.”

Agrippa was intrigued by all he had heard and wanted to hear Paul speak to the charges.  As this case was going before Caesar, Agrippa needed to know about the charges against Paul, and what had transpired.  Fetus was more than happy to comply with Agrippa II, and arranged for Paul to appear before him.

Paul before Agrippa

23 So, on the next day when Agrippa came together with Bernice amid great pomp, and entered the auditorium accompanied by the commanders and the prominent men of the city, at the command of Festus, Paul was brought in.

Who was Bernice?  She was the daughter of King Herod Agrippa I and a sister of Herod Agrippa IIActs 21:32 tells us there were five cohorts, each having a commander.  These commanders along with an undetermined number of prominent men would have been a most impressive audience for Paul’s witness.

24 Festus *said, “King Agrippa, and all you gentlemen here present with us, you see this man about whom all the people of the Jews appealed to me, both at Jerusalem and here, loudly declaring that he ought not to live any longer.

Picture all the guests dressed in their finery and Paul dressed in Jewish garb.  At this point Paul’s clothing must have been in very poor condition.  Paul stood before this gathering not timidly but boldly because he knew Jesus was by his side.  Although the Jews were calling for Paul’s death, there were no grounds for such a punishment under Roman Law.

25 “But I found that he had committed nothing worthy of death; and since he himself appealed to the Emperor, I decided to send him.

I believe this was a back door appeal by Festus to Agrippa for help with Caesar.Festus had no evidence and nothing concrete to write in his report to Caesar.Perhaps if the king were to question Paul he might find something justifying the arrest of Paul and his subsequent appearance before Caesar.  See acts 25:26&27 to follow.  Festus was between a rock and a hard place.  On one hand he had to have the cooperation of the Jews in order to keep the peace.  On the other hand he inherited a prisoner who had violated no Roman law.

26 “Yet I have nothing definite about him to write to my lord. Therefore I have brought him before you all and especially before you, King Agrippa, so that after the investigation has taken place, I may have something to write. 27 “For it seems absurd to me in sending a prisoner, not to indicate also the charges against him.”
CREDITS, LINKS, AND CITATION
[1] –scripture verses from Cross wire Study Bible
[3] – Commentaries By Marion Adams
[4] – Wikipedia.org


Monday, July 6, 2015

ACTS CHAPTER 24 Paul on Trial Before Felix

Acts Chapter 24
Begin viewing chapter 24 at 2:38:28 

Chapter 24 Summary

Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset and David Brown  summarize this chapter as follows. ”PAUL, ACCUSED BY A PROFESSIONAL PLEADER BEFORE FELIX, MAKES HIS DEFENSE, AND IS REMANDED FOR A FURTHER HEARING. AT A PRIVATE INTERVIEW FELIX TREMBLES UNDER PAUL'S PREACHING, BUT KEEPS HIM PRISONER FOR TWO YEARS, WHEN HE WAS SUCCEEDED BY FESTUS.” [2]

Paul Stands Accused Before Felix

  1  After five days the high priest Ananias came down with some elders, with an attorney named Tertullus, and they brought charges to the governor against Paul.

The word “attorney” is translated from the Greek word “rhetor hray'-tore from 4483; a speaker, i.e. (by implication) a forensic advocate:--orator. see GREEK for 4483”
We might just call him a “mouth piece” (slang for attorney) or someone who represents or speaks for another.
Why did Ananias feel the need for an orator to speak for him?
It is believed these Roman’s filled the roll of attorneys; skilled in Latin and the Roman law. 

2  After Paul had been summoned, Tertullus began to accuse him, saying to the governor, “Since we have, through you attained much peace, and since by your providence reforms are being carried out for this nation,  3 we acknowledge this in every way and everywhere, most excellent Felix, with all thankfulness.
This preamble seems excessively lavish praise given by Tertullus.
Beginning a trail by praising the governor was common practice.
Felix was credited with restoring order by lowering  the incidents of lawlessness and violence, [JOSEPHUS, Antiquities, 20.8.4; confirmed by TACITUS, Annals, 12.54].
He was also know for being a wicked man and the tactics he used were said to be very cruel.
He brought about peace at a very high price for the Jewish people.

5  “For we have found this man a real pest and a fellow who stirs up dissension among all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarene's'.

 ”a real pest” - Some translations may say the word plague instead of pest.
I prefer the use of the word plague because it indicates more severity than a pest. 
A mosquito is a pest easily put away, while a plague is more severe as we saw in Genesis where God brought about plagues upon Egypt.
Why was Paul referred to as a plague?
Paul was blamed for riots where ever he went (see also Acts 16:20).
Paul was seen as a leader of “the way” (also known as the “Nazarene sect” Acts 24:14 .
Paul was also accused of bringing Gentiles into the inner part of the temple causing the riot.
These were the charges levied by Tertullus.

6  “And he even tried to desecrate the temple; and then we arrested him. [We wanted to judge him according to our own Law.

Tertullus was referring to the incident reported in Acts 21:28 .
Paul was also accused of bringing Gentiles into the inner part of the temple defiling the holy place in their eyes.
This charge is a violation of religious law not civil law.
Why then did Tertullus include this charge?
Tertullus did not charge Paul with bringing the Greek into the temple but rather inciting a riot.
He included this charge in order to link the temple disturbance to a violation of civil law.
 Rioting was a criminal offense under Roman law.
Tertullus continues in verse 7:

7  “But Lysias the commander came along, and with much violence took him out of our hands,

This statement by Tertullus concerning Lysias actions of much violence was a blatant lie.
Tertullus twisted the facts.
We have read in Acts 23:27; a statement made by Lysias, in a letter of how he rescued Paul a Roman citizen, from the Jews.
As we know from Acts 23:10 the reason for Lysias actions were to protect Paul a Roman citizen.
 No violence was recorded of this claimed rescue by Lysias.

8  ordering his accusers to come before you.] By examining him yourself concerning all these matters you will be able to ascertain the things of which we accuse him.” 9  The Jews also joined in the attack, asserting that these things were so.

These charges were presented in much the same way as charges are read to a judge at an arraignment hearing today.
After jury selection in today’s courts, attorney’s use an opening statement to the juries to set the ground work for the trial.
 
10  When the governor had nodded for him to speak, Paul responded:  “Knowing that for many years you have been a judge to this nation, I make my defense,  11  since you can take note of the fact that no more than twelve days ago I went up to Jerusalem to worship.

It is believed that at this time Felix had served as judge for six or seven years.
He served in Galilee for even a longer time.
Was Paul attempting to butter up the governor?
No not at all. 
Paul was recognizing the qualifications and authority  of Felix to judge civil crimes.
  1. Paul arrived in Jerusalem 12 days prior see Acts 21:15-17
  2. Next  after seeing James Acts 21:18-26 Paul was arrested Acts 21:27.
  3. After which Paul was brought before the Sanhedrin (Acts 22:30 , 23:1-10).
12  “Neither in the temple, nor in the synagogues, nor in the city itself did they find me carrying on a discussion with anyone or causing a riot.13  “Nor can they prove to you the charges of which they now accuse me.

Paul began his defense by refuting the charges brought against him. 
Paul did not come to Jerusalem to cause trouble.
He came to report to James and to celebrate Pentecost in the temple.
Paul had no political agenda nor did he intend to cause any riots.
There were no witnesses or evidentiary proof of the allegations brought against Paul.

14  “But this I admit to you, that according to the Way which they call a sect I do serve the God of our fathers, believing everything that is in accordance with the Law and that is written in the Prophets; 15 having a hope in God, which these men cherish themselves, that there shall certainly be a resurrection of both the righteous and the wicked.

Paul continues his defense by stating he was a true Jew believing in, and worshiping the same God as his accusers. 
The hope Paul speaks of hear is the hope in the resurrection of the dead on the day of judgment.
Paul points out that he was a follower of Jesus the Nazarene and as such was a member of “The Way”.
The Christians did not appose the Jewish faith. The Christians followed Jesus the promised Christ.

16  “In view of this, I also do my best to maintain always a blameless conscience both before God and before men.

Paul was a Jew and as Jesus he followed all the Jewish laws customs and observances; see also  Acts 23:1.
Paul was simply saying he had nothing in his life which could be held against him by Jewish or civil authorities.  His conscience was clear.

17  “Now after several years I came to bring alms to my nation and to present offerings;  18 in which they found me occupied in the temple, having been purified, without any crowd or uproar. But there were some Jews from Asia 19 who ought to have been present before you and to make accusation, if they should have anything against me.

Paul brought alms “alms translated from the Greek word 1654 eleemosune el-eh-ay-mos-oo'-nay from 1656; compassionateness, i.e. (as exercised towards the poor) beneficence, or (concretely) a benefaction:--alms(-deeds). see GREEK for 1656” [5]
Paul worshiped in the Temple per Jewish custom and was also in Jerusalem to observe the day of Pentecost. 
Paul made no spectacle of his worship or purification.
Paul, asking to be confronted by those who were accusing him, was well within his rights.
 
20  “Or else let these men themselves tell what misdeed they found when I stood before the Council, 21 other than for this one statement which I shouted out while standing among them, ‘For the resurrection of the dead I am on trial before you today.”’ 

These were the same Jews who followed Paul during his missionary trips to Asia these Jews were the ones who followed him in order to cause unrest.
There was no one who witnessed the complaints against Paul.

22  But Felix, having a more exact knowledge about The Way, put them off, saying, “When Lysias the commander comes down, I will decide your case.”

Why did Felix call for a recess in the trial?
Felix knew Paul was correct in pointing to the lack of witnesses to his alleged crimes.
Lysias the commander of the fortress which was attached to the outer wall of the temple witnessed Paul at the temple.
There is however, no evidence Felix called for Lysias to come.
It is doubtful Felix really expected Lysias to come without being summoned to do so.
The question remains why did Felix call for the recess?

23  Then he gave orders to the centurion for him to be kept in custody and yet have some freedom, and not to prevent any of his friends from ministering to him.

Although Paul was a prisoner he was allowed visitors he was not free to leave.
You might say Paul was under house arrest.
Paul was a Roman citizen and could not be punished without a trial, and there could be no trial without witnesses to the charges.
Felix was stuck between the rock and a hard place and so he decided to maintain custody but not arresting Paul.

24  But some days later Felix arrived with Drusilla, his wife who was a Jewess, and sent for Paul and heard him speak about faith in Christ Jesus.

Drusilla was the daughter of Herod Agrippa 1st.  “’She was "given in marriage to Azizus, king of the Emesenes, who had consented to be circumcised for the sake of the alliance. But this marriage was soon dissolved, after this manner: When Festus was procurator of Judea, he saw her, and being captivated with her beauty, persuaded her to desert her husband, transgress the laws of her country, and marry himself" [JOSEPHUS, Antiquities, 20.7.1,2]. Such was this "wife" of Felix.'” [2]
It is possible that Felix sent for Paul as a means to please his Jewish wife.  Knowing something of “The Way” perhaps Felix saw Paul as a good spokesman for the new sect.  Perhaps believing this new faith was a sect of the Jewish faith.
 
25  But as he was discussing righteousness, self-control and the judgment to come, Felix became frightened and said, “Go away for the present, and when I find time I will summon you.”

Self control and living a righteous life was difficult for Felix to listen to.
Felix had lived an immoral life. Listening he became very uncomfortable especially when Paul spoke of judgment; refer to testimony of TACITUS, the Roman Annalist [Annals, 9; 12.54].
There were many times he called for Paul.
He could, and should have called on Paul to ask about how he could turn his life around and avoid the judgment to come.
We see in our own witnessing that people are fearful of judgment; however are unwilling to submit to change.
 
26  At the same time too, he was hoping that money would be given him by Paul; therefore he also used to send for him quite often and converse with him.

Had Paul offered Felix a bribe then Felix could have easily prosecuted him under Roman law.
Paul was summoned several times to Felix’s court.
Scripture does not tell us the nature of these talks.
However the context of these verses would lead one to believe these talks did not encompass salvation or eternal damnation.
Perhaps Felix was putting on a hypocritical show for his wife.

27  But after two years had passed, Felix was succeeded by Porcius Festus, and wishing to do the Jews a favor, Felix left Paul imprisoned.

Paul used the years under house arrest to write to the churches.  Many of Paul’s letters to the churches while in custody comprise a considerable part of the new testament.  It is believed Luke wrote the book of acts during this same period of time.  
“Porcius Festus--Little is known of him. He died a few years after this [JOSEPHUS, Antiquities, 20.8.9-9.1].”[2] 

As always comments are welcomed.


CREDITS

[1] –scripture verses from:   Cross wire Study Bible
[3] – Commentaries By Marion Adams
[4] – Wikipedia.org

[5] – Strongs exhaustive concordance

Featured Post