Sunday, May 26, 2013


GOSPEL OF JOHN
CHAPTER 19

INTRODUCTION

In chapter 18 we saw Jesus betrayed by Judas in the garden.  We read of Peter denying Jesus three times before dawn.   While Jesus was being questioned by Ananias.   Jesus was brought before Chiapas and a select few of the Sanhedrin.  Jesus having been found guilty by this kangaroo court of blasphemy was brought before Pilot, who could find no guilt in him and sent him back to be judged by the Jews
In Chapter 19 we see Pilate once  again faced with an angry crowed of Jews; faced with the dilemma of what to do to appease this crowd.  Pilate ordered Jesus to be flogged in hopes this action would appease the blood thirsty crowd.  Pilate failed to realize the depth of hatred the authorities held towards Jesus

THE CROWN OF THORNS

1 Pilate then took Jesus and scourged Him.

The Romans used three types of corporal punishment according to the crime
1.Beating (fustigatio)
The least severe of the three punishments was given for lesser offenses
»such as left or homosexuality among other crimes lesser crimes
These beating were metered out by the duty officer and by his discretion beatings could
Many times lead to the death of the individual
Flogging (Flagellatio)
was given to those people who committed crimes against Rome of a more serious nature
Often used as a prelude to crucifixion.
The third and most brutal was scourging (vergeratio)
Also used as a prelude to crucifixion.  

• 2 And the soldiers twisted together a crown of thorns and put it on His head, and put a purple robe on Him;

The color purple was used to signify royalty
Although Jesus was of royal blood; they used the cloak to mock Him.
It is believed that the thorns on the crown were meant to resemble the radiant corona of a crown

3 and they began to come up to Him and say, “Hail, King of the Jews!” and to give Him slaps in the face.

Although slaps to the face was in no way as severe as the flogging here again it was done as an insult

4 Pilate came out again *and said to them, “Behold, I am bringing Him out to you so that you may know that I find no guilt in Him.”  5  Jesus then came out, wearing the crown of thorns and  the purple robe.  Pilate *said to them, “Behold, the Man!”

Some may say Pilate was acting courageous and feared angering the crowd.
According to Josephus (Jewish historian) Pilates very nature was that of a vindictive person with a furious temper.
Having been previously admonished by Tiberius; Pilate feared further reprisals from

6 So when the chief priests and the officers saw Him, they cried out saying, Crucify, crucify!” Pilate *said to them, “Take Him yourselves and crucify Him, for I find no guilt in Him

I believe the high priest ensured the crowd was made up of hand selected Jews who could easily be swayed.
The priests were not going to be satisfied with  mere corporal punishment.
Nothing short of crucifixion would satisfy them
I believe Pilate was annoyed at what he must have considered petty and beneath his office

7 The Jews answered him, “We have a law, and by that law He ought to die because He made Himself to be the Son of God.”

In desperation the religious leaders reveal to Pilate what they really had against Jesus.
The selected members of the Sanhedrin agreed, Jesus had blasphemed by saying He was the Son of God and had broken the Levitical Law
(Lev 24:16) ‘Moreover, the one who blasphemes the name of the Lord shall surely be put to death; all the congregation shall certainly stone him.  The alien as well as the native, when he blasphemes the Name, shall be put to
                 •Pilate questions Jesus a second time, concerning his identity     and authority (19:8-11)

8 Therefore when Pilate heard this statement, he was even more afraid:
Why was he afraid

There are several theories on why John though Pilate was “even more afraid”
Some believe Pilates wife was very superstitious and believed Jesus had mighty powers.
Some hold Pilate feared an uprising which would bring about Tiberius’ wrath.
I chose to believe that God put the fear in Pilates heart that prophesy might be fulfilled.

9 and he entered into the Praetorium again * and said to Jesus, “Where are You From?” But Jesus gave him no answer

There is no mention that Pilate had Jesus returned to the inside of the praetorium.
We can reasonable assume that Pilate questioned Jesus once again inside the praetorium.
Continuing the line of questioning raised by the Jewish claim in verse 7
Pilate asks a logical question; where are you from?
Jesus did not immediately answer Pilate, knowing Pilate would not have believed Him

10 So Pilate *said to Him, “You do not speak to me? Do You not know that I have authority to release You, and I have authority to crucify You?”

Pilate must have been indignant with Jesus’ lake of response to what he thought a reasonable question considering the Jewish charges against Him.
Being insistent on getting an answer reminded Jesus of his authority over Jesus of life or death
Jesus response to this statement in verse 11

11 Jesus answered, “You would  have no authority over Me, unless it had been given you from above; for this reason he who delivered Me to you has the greater sin.”

Pilate may have thought Jesus meant that his power came from Caesar.
However Jesus was actually saying the power came from above meaning heaven
A place Pilate was unfamiliar with
God is in total control causing some to rise to high positions for His purpose

12 As a result of this Pilate made efforts to release Him, but he Jews cried out saying, “if you release this Man, You are no friend of Caesar; everyone who makes this Pilate made efforts to release Him, but the Jews cried out saying, “If you release this Man, you are no friend of Caesar; everyone who makes himself out to be a king opposes Caesar.”

Pilate still finding no capital crime in Jesus returns to the crowd only to find the crowd had become increasingly angered appealing to Pilates loyalty to Caesar, and his tenuous posting in Israel.

13 Therefore when Pilate heard these words, he brought Jesus out, and sat down on the judgment seat at a place called the Pavemen, but in Hebrew Babbatha.

Pilate had the judgment seat brought out on what I believe to be the landing of the steps leading to the praetorium.
Pilate fearing that he would be reported to Caesar as not being loyal to Rome had no choice but to pronounce the death sentence.

15 So they cried out, away with Him, away with Him, crucify Him!” Pilate *said to them, “shall I crucify your King?” The chief priest answered, “We have no king but Caesar.”

Now this transpired on the day of Sabbath preparation which is believed to be a Friday (Matt 27:62Mark 15:42, &  Luke 23:54)
John also identifies this day as the day of preparation of the Passover (cf. 19:31)

THE CRUCIFIXION

16 So he then handed Him over to them to be crucified. 

Verses 15-16 Most of the *Jewish leaders hated the *Romans. They wanted to be free from *Roman rule. But they hated Jesus even more.
Although  he was their real king and their *Messiah, they *rejected him. They pretended instead that they were loyal to the *Emperor. So, at last, Pilate made his decision. He ordered Jesus’ death.

17 They took Jesus, therefore, and He went out, bearing His own cross, to the place called the Place of a skull, which is called is called in Hebrew, Golgotha.

The actual sentence was carried out by the Roman soldiers (JN 19:32)
Golgotha was very close to the city gates and all who entered or left by that gate saw the three crosses (JN 19:20)
It was common for the condemned to carry their own cross
Most likely just the cross beam which in Latin is called Patibulum.
»For expedience sake the upright portion of the cross was left standing awaiting the next execution

18 There they crucified Him, and with Him two other men, one on either side, and Jesus in between.

We don’t know anything about the other two men except one was repentant and admonished the other who insolent and not repentant
John does not go into the gruesome details of the actual crucifixion. 

19 Pilate also wrote an inscription and put it on the cross. It was written, “JESUS THE NAZARENE, THE KING OF THE JEWS.”

There two styles of cross used by Rome
Crux immissa which would look like the traditional cross we see in artists renderings
Crux commissa with the cross beam on top of the upright
 Luke 23:38 says the inscription was placed “over him”
Matt 27:37 writes that it was placed over Jesus’ head.
By these descriptions we can safely assume the artists renditions are accurate
As for why Pilate had this sign made is conjecture
Some would believe it was to mock the Jews charge of “we have no king but Caesar”
Some would say that it was an insult to Jesus as being a rightful king of the Jews but was denied by the Jews.
The point here is that Pilate had the plaque in three languages so all who saw it knew what it said.

20 Therefore many of the Jews read this inscription, for the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city; and it was written in Hebrew, Latin and in Greek.

In my opinion this would make this placard the ultimate mockery and insult to the Jewish leaders
Interesting to note that John was the only gospel writer to mention the sign was written in three languages.

21 So the chief priests of the Jews were saying to Pilate, “Do not write, ‘The King of the Jews’; but that He said, ‘I am King of the Jews.’” 22  Pilate answered, “what I have written I have written.”

The Jewish leaders did there best to have Pilate change what he wrote in an attempt to validate their actions
Pilate could not be moved.
I believe when Pilate washed his hands he was finished with the Jewish dirty work
I believe God spoke to Pilate and caused him to write what he wrote.

23 Then the soldiers, when they had crucified Jesus, took His outer garments and made four parts, a part to every soldier and also the tunic; now the tunic was seamless , woven in one piece

It was common practice for the soldiers who performed the crucifixion to divide up the positions of the crucified person.
The tunic was an undergarment woven so there would be no seam.
Why the soldiers would want these blood soaked garments is beyond my comprehension.

24 So they said to one another, “Let us not tear it, but cast lots for it, to decide whose it shall be”; this was to fulfill the Scripture: “They divided My outer garments among them, and for My clothing they cast lots

We can see that God is in charge
The symbolism may be the representation of a priestly garment left intact demonstrating Jesus as a high priest then, now, and forever never to be torn from His position at the right hand of the Father

25 Therefore the soldiers did these things.  But standing by the cross of Jesus were His mother, and His mother’s sister Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene.

How many women were at the cross?
By Johns description it sounds as though there were 4 women at the cross.
Jesus’ mother (not named here)
Jesus’ mother’s sister (unamed)
Mary the wife of Clopas (possibly Jesus’ mothers sister)
Mary Magdalene
No mention here of any of the 11 chosen at the cross

26 When Jesus therefore saw His mother, and the disciple whom He loved standing nearby, He said to His mother, “Woman, behold your son!”

Which disciple was Jesus talking to?
Now up to this point only three or four women were mentioned as being at the cross.
Now Jesus is addressing a disciple (a follower not necessarily an apostle)
The clue here is when John said “the one He loved”
Most Bible scholars believe this to be John himself
To understand what is happening we must make some assumptions based in fact
We must assume at this point that Joseph husband to Mary was no longer living
We know of no other family members were at the crucifixion
Because women were not allowed to own or hold property we see Jesus concerned over His mothers well being turned to one he trusted John

27 Then *He said to the disciple, “Behold, your mother!” From that hour the disciple took her into his own household.

It was customary for a sibling or other close relative to care for Mary; why then did Jesus relegate this responsibility of John?
From that point on Mary (mother to Jesus) lived with John.
There is no mention of John not believed to have property the word household refers to Johns family.
»I believe this family to mean his brothers and sisters in Christ, as there is no mention of Johns worldly family members

28 After this, Jesus, knowing that all things had already been accomplished , to fulfill the Scriptures, said* “I am thirsty.”

If all things had been accomplished; why did Jesus say He was thirsty?
Also as Jesus took on the sins of the world His Father could not look upon Him and Jesus thirsted for His Father

29 A jar full of sour wine was standing there; so they put a sponge full of sour wine upon a branch of hyssop and brought it up to His mouth.

Jesus had completed all the father had asked of Him, however the Scripture Ps 69:21 which reads “They also gave me gall for my food and for my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink” had not been satisfied
The wine was of poor quality and tasted like vinegar.  Relegated to lower classes and soldiers

30 Therefore when Jesus had received the sour wine, He said, “it is finished!” And He bowed His head and gave up His spirit.

Jesus received the sourness of the sin of the world.
Having fulfilled all scripture concerning the Messiah, Jesus voluntarily gave up His mortal life.
This is important because Jesus was in total control even on the cross

JESUS’ BODY WAS TAKEN AWAY

31 Then the Jews, because it was the day of preparation, so that the bodies would not remain on the cross on the Sabbath (for that Sabbath was a high day), asked  Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away.

Now the Sabbath begins at 6PM and according to the law (Deut 21:22-23 and Josh 8:29) states the bodies of the executed must be removed.
It was customary for the Romans to leave the bodies hanging on the cross as a warning to those who might go against Rome.
The bodies were left for the scavengers
»This practice also showed the absolute disregard Rome had for the Jewish people.

32 So the soldiers came, and broke the legs of the first man and of the other who was crucified with Him; 33 but coming to Jesus, when they saw that He was already dead, they did not break His legs.

Breaking the legs would have caused the entire bodies weight to be supported by the arms forcing the arms to severely restrict breathing this coupled with shock would have hastened the death of the condemned
Jesus had already given up His spirit and His legs were not broken fulfilling scripture as we will see in verse 36

34 But one of the soldiers pierced His side with a spear, and immediately blood and water came out.

If it was obvious to the soldiers that Jesus was dead ref JN 19:31; why did they pierce His side?
The probability here is that the soldier did not to leave any doubt as to the death of Jesus
Now if the spear was thrust upward from the right side upward below the rib cage into the pericardium sack
The stomach would certainly be punctured and it’s liquid contents would have been mixed with the blood from the heart itself.
Had Jesus not already been dead this act would have killed Him
John felt this to be important with a spiritual significance; what are we to gather from the blood and water
We know from our past studies
A blood sacrifice was the only offering suitable for the forgiveness of sin
We also know that there are several references to Jesus being the water of life.
That the shedding of Jesus blood before the Passover was not accident
Lambs blood was smeared on the door post and lentils of each home  so the angle of death would pass over that house and all within would be saved
And so also Jesus’ blood was shed for all who would claim Him as their Christ

35 And he who has seen has testified, and his testimony is true; and he knows that he is telling the truth, so that you also may believe.

This account was an eye witness testimony of John and the women also who were there.
This account can be attested as a true account because of the witness of John and the women thus satisfying the law regarding the death of another
36 For these things came to pass to fulfill the Scripture, “Not a bone of Him shall be broken.” 37 And again another Scripture says, “they shall look on Him whom they pierced.”
Both these prophesies were fulfilled
The first, “Not a bone of him shall be broken,” may be quoted from a number of different OT passages: Exod 12:10 LXX, Exod 12:46, Num 9:12, or Ps 34:20.
The parallel between the Passover lamb and the Lamb of God is unmistakable
“The second quotation, “They shall look upon the One whom they have pierced,” is easier to locate; it is a citation of Zech 12:10. Here a single phrase is quoted from Zech 12, but the entire context is associated with the events surrounding the crucifixion.”
»“The “Spirit of grace and of supplication” is poured out on the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem in the first part of verse 10. A few verses later in 13:1 Yahweh says “In that day a fountain will be opened for the house of David and for the inhabitants of Jerusalem, for sin and for impurity.” The blood which flowed from Jesus’ pierced side may well be what John sees as the connection here, since as the shedding of the blood of the sacrificial victim it represents cleansing from sin.”

38 After these things Joseph of Arimathea, being a disciple of Jesus, but a secret one for fear of the Jews, asked Pilate that he might take away the body of Jesus; and Pilate granted permission, So he came and took away His body.

Both Joseph and Nicodemus were secret followers of Jesus for fear of their respective important positions
Although this is the first mention of Joseph we have read of the discourse between Nicodemus and Jesus about being born again

40So they took the body of Jesus and bound it in linen wrappings with the spices, as is the burial custom of the Jews

Expensive  spices were wrapped in the linen with the body
The graves were most often a gave or small hewn cave with a small entrance sealed usually with just a stone
The purpose of the spices were to mask the odor of decomposing bodies

41 Now in the place where He was crucified there was a garden, and in the garden a new tomb in which no one had yet been laid.   42 Therefore because of the Jewish day of preparation, since the tomb was nearby, they laid Jesus there.

The reason for use of this particular tomb is explained
This may have been a tomb set aside for Nicodemus Himself as he was advanced in years
The cost of the spices and the use of the new tomb was a significant offering of Nicodemus.

ACKNOWLEGEMENTS AND CITATIONS
This study contains quotes from Ryrie Study Bible, Bible.org commentaries, and Matthew Henry

Monday, May 20, 2013

John 18 The crucifixion of the Son of God


JOHN 
CHAPTER 18


INTRODUCTION

In the previous chapter we saw the concern Jesus had for His disciples.  He knew what was to happen and how His disciples would react.  He sought to comfort them with words of reassurance and a promise that He would not leave them alone.

JESUS BETRAYED

1 When Jesus had SPOKEN THESE WORDS, He went forth with His disciples over the ravine of the Kidron, where there was a garden, in which He entered with His disciples.


2 Now Judas also, who was betraying Him, knew the place, for Jesus had often met there with His disciples
  • How did Judas know where Jesus would be?
    • Luke records the answer to this question in (Lk 21:37 thru Lk 22:39 )
    • Jesus often went there with his disciples to Mt Olivet

3 Judas then, having received the Roman cohort and officers from the chief priests and the Pharisees, came there with lanterns and torches and weapons.
  • The Roman cohort consisted of approximately 960 men
    • Now with the cohort were the officers of the priests guard (X Jn 18:12 )
  • Why were so many men needed to capture Jesus?
    • They probably feared large crowds of Jews would gather

4 So Jesus, knowing all the things that were coming upon Him, went forth *and said to them, “Whom do you seek?” (X Jn 13:1)
  • Why did Jesus ask this question when He knew what the answer would be?
    • I believe for the benefit of His disciples so they would remember what He had told them
    • Also to focus their attention on Him and not His disciples

5 They answered Him, “Jesus the Nazarene.” *He said to them, “I am He.” And Judas also, who was betraying Him, was standing with them.
6 So when He said to them, “I am He,” they drew back and fell to the ground.
  • What or who caused them to fall to the ground?
    • The Power of God was demonstrated to them so there would be know doubt He could have defeated them and prevented them from taking Him

7 Therefore He again asked them, “Whom do you seek?” And they said, “Jesus the Nazarene.”
  • Was Jesus giving them the chance to back away from His power?
    • When Jesus first replied they fell back or stepped back perhaps surprised then fell to the ground

8 Jesus answered, “I told you that I am He; so if you seek Me, let these go their way,”
Jesus said this to:
9 to fulfill the word which He spoke, “Of those whom You have given Me I lost not one.”
  • Jesus sought to protect His disciples in this dark hour

10 Simon Peter then, having a sword, drew it and struck the high priest’s slave, and cut off his right ear: and the slaves name was Malchus.
  • Where did Peter get the sword?
    • I don’t believe Jesus would have allowed any of His disciples to carry weapons except perhaps a staff.
    • We can surmise peter got the sword from one of the soldiers in the cohort

11 So Jesus said to Peter, “Put the sword into the sheath; the cup which the Father has given Me, shall I not drink it?” 
  • Jesus telling Peter would you have me not do the will of the Father?

JESUS BROUGHT BEFORE PILOT

12 So the Roman cohort and the commander and the officers of the Jews, arrested Jesus and bound Him,
13 and led Him to Annas first; for he was father-in-law of Caiaphas, who was high priest that year.
  • Annas was the son of Seth and was appointed by the Roman legate Quirinius as the first High priest of Iudeaea in 6AD
  • Caiaphas was appointed by Rome to be high priest for that year.

14 Now Caiaphas was the one who had advised the Jews that it was expedient for one man to die on behalf of the people. (X Jn 11:50 )
  • As the Roman appointed high priest Caiaphas would guard his position zealously.
  • As high priest (ruler of Jewish religion) Caiaphas enjoyed the luxury and power of the office.
  • Much in the same way as our elected officials enjoy their luxury and power today
  • Caiaphas convinced the Pharisees of the need to permanently prevent Jesus from causing problems with the Roman rule

15 Simon Peter was following Jesus, and so was another disciple. Now that disciple was known to the high priest, and entered with Jesus into the court of the high priest,
  • It would seem that not all the disciples scattered when Jesus was taken
  • Simon Peter followed the cohort at a discrete distance
  • Peter did not immediately enter the court yard of the high priest

16 but Peter was standing at the door outside. So the other disciple, who was known to the high priest, went out and spoke to the doorkeeper, and brought Peter in
  • Who was this other disciple who had garnished much favor of the high priest?
    • Although not named here I believe this person to be no other than Judas Iscariot
    • I don’t believe any other disciple would have been allowed into the court yard
  • Even the Roman cohort out of respect did not enter the court yard

17 Then the slave-girl who kept the door *said to Peter, “You are not also one of this man’s disciples, are you?” *He said, “I am not.”
  • Now the other disciple (Judas) had talked to the keeper of the door and convinced her to let Peter in
  • The slave girl must have know Judas to be a disciple and drew a natural conclusion

18 Now the slaves and the officers were standing there, having made a charcoal fire, for it was cold and they were warming themselves; and Peter was also with them, standing and warming himself. 19 The he high priest then questioned Jesus about His disciples, and about His teaching.
  • Was this to be a fair trial?
    • The verdict was never in doubt
  • Were the questioning asked to find the truth?
    • I believe these questions were designed to gather intelligence on Jesus and His disciples
    • That this information could be used against Jesus

20 Jesus answered him, “I have spoken openly to the world; I always taught in synagogues and in the temple, where all the Jews come together; and I spoke nothing in secret.  (X Mat 4:23 Jn 6:59 )
  • Jesus taught the Jews people in the open using for the most part parables.
  • Jesus used these parable to illustrate to all who would have ears to hear truth
  • Jesus did however give guidance and instruction to  His disciples in private.
  • Mark records Jesus did not answer the charges made before Caiaphas (x Mk 14:60
    • Possibly He was waiting for a question worthy of responce

21 “Why do you question Me? Question those who have heard what I spoke to them; they know what I said.”
22 When He had said this, one of the officers standing nearby struck Jesus, saying, “Is that the way You answer the high priest?”
  • The officer struck Jesus because he thought Jesus was show disrespect by His answer
  • This officer was one of the priestly guards not a Roman officer
  • The Romans were outside the court yard.

23 Jesus answered him, “If I have spoken wrongly, testify of the wrong; but if rightly, why do you strike Me?
  • Why did the priests guard strike Jesus?
  • It was part of his job to discipline those he perceived to show disrespect to the high priest
  • The guard had no idea of who he was striking

24 So Annas sent Him bound to Caiaphas the high priest.

PETERS DENILE

25 Now Simon Peter was standing and warming himself. So they said to him, “You are not also one of His disciples, are you?” He denied it, and said, “I am not.”
  • This question way asked by a female slave who was the door keeper.
  • Did Peter fear he too would be turned over to the priest as a conspirator?
    • Peter told Jesus he would die for Him
    • But when put to the test he failed to even acknowledge Jesus, just as Jesus had told him he would.

26 One of the slaves of the high priest, being a relative of the one whose ear Peter cut off, said, did I not see you in the garden with Him?”
  • This slave was surely one of those who was in the garden when Jesus was arrested and yet the slave asked the question in an accusative manner

27 Peter then denied it again, and immediately a rooster crowed. 
  • Peter denied Jesus three times just as Jesus had told him
    • Jesus forgave Peter his denial. 
      • This demonstrates the magnitude of Jesus’

JESUS BROUGHT TO PILOT

28 Then *they LED Jesus from Caiaphas into the Praetorium, and it was early; and they themselves did not enter into the Praetorium so the would not be defiled, but might eat the Passover.
  • The term referred originally to the "tent of the commander, or praetor", and thus denoted military headquarters.
  • Two possible praetorium sites in Jerusalem have been proposed: the Antonia Fortress and Herod's Palace.

29 Therefore Pilate went *out to them and said, “What accusation do you bring against this Man?
30 They answered and said to him, “If this Man were not an evildoer, we would not have delivered Him to you.”
  • They did not accuse Jesus of violating Roman law at this time.
  • Instead they said He was accused of being an evildoer.
  • This led Pilot to believe that Jesus had violated some Jewish law and should be judged by the religious leaders

31 So Pilate said to them, “Take Him yourselves, and judge Him according to your law.” The Jews said to him, “We are not permitted to put anyone to death,”
According to the Mishnah (Sanhedrin 1:4) the death penalty could only be inflicted, after  trial, by a Sanhedrin composed of twenty-three judges and there were four types of death penalty (Sanhedrin 7:1): stoning, burning, slaying (by the sword), and strangling. A bare reading of these and the other accounts in the tractate would seem to suggest a vast proliferation of the death penalty. [Rabbi Louis Jacobs]
In theory, Judaism had a death penalty for several different crimes, including murder. But acceptance of the death penalty was theoretical and never implemented according to tradition. According to Jewish Law, one was only deserving of a death penalty if two witnesses saw the crime, warned the aggressor of the consequences, the aggressor acknowledged the situation and consequences, and committed the crime anyway. Thus, Judaism established conditions that made death penalty sentencing nearly impossible, even in a theoretical situation. [Rabbi Barry Dov Lerner]

  • Now the high priest could not take a chance on a full trial because there were those in the Sanhedrin who not vote for the death penalty.
  • The only witnesses who could testify of Jesus and His teachings would testify to His innocence.
  • The high priest believed that Jesus must be put to death to ensure his position as high priest
  • And to ensure the people would not rise up and place Jesus on the throne as messiah and king
  • If Caiaphas could get the Romans to execute Jesus then his hands would be clean … after all he didn’t pass judgment in violation of Jewish law
  • The high priest was instrumental in fulfilling the prophesy, concerning the manner of death of Jesus. (V32)

32 to fulfill the word of Jesus which He spoke, signifying by what kind of death He was about to die. 
  • Luke 18:32 “For He will be handed over to the Gentiles, and will be mocked and mistreated and spit upon,”… (X Mat 26:2 )

33 Therefore Pilate entered again into the Praetorium, and summoned Jesus and said to Him, “Are You the King of the Jews?”
  • Had Jesus just said yes I am then Pilot would be justified in believing the charge of sedition.

34 Jesus answered, “Are you saying this on your own initiative, or did others tell you about Me?”
  • “Jesus asked whether Pilate’s question arose from his own Roman viewpoint or from a Jewish viewpoint[Ryrie Bible]


35 Pilate answered, “I am not a Jew, am I? Your own nation and the chief priests delivered You to me; what have You done?
  • Pilot did not answer Jesus’ question
  • Pilots response was one of indignity saying how am I supposed to know of you except for what I have been told by the Chief Priest

36 Jesus answered, “My kingdom [or kingship]is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, then My servants would be fighting so that I would not be handed over to the Jews” but as it is, My kingdom is not of this realm.”
  • Because Pilate’s answer indicated that he was concerned only about a rival political kingdom to Rome (v35), our Lord replied as He did in this verse, indicating that His was not such a kingdom.  Pilate was then satisfied Jesus was not a political threat and therefore wished to release Him.
  • Jesus was tell Pilate that His kingship and authority was not of this world

37 Therefore Pilate said to Him, “So You are a king?” Jesus answered, “You say correctly that I am a king.  For this I have been born, and for this I have come into the world, to testify to the truth.  Everyone who is of the truth hears My voice.”

38 Pilate *said to Him, “What is truth?”
  • Pilate was not being philosophical but was simply expressing frustration and irritation at Jesus’ avoidance of a direct answer to what seemed to him to be a simple question [Ryrie Bible commentary]

39 And when he had said this, he went out again to the Jews *and said to them, “I find no guilt in Him.
40 So they cried out again, saying, “Not this Man, but Barabbas.” Now Barabbas was a robber.

Featured Post